Search for: "MATTER OF L R" Results 4461 - 4480 of 7,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2009, 12:44 pm by David Jacobson
The Commissioner also accepted that it is usual practice in workers compensation matters for an employer to provide the assessing doctor with all relevant information about the employee. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:33 am
Atkins, 31, of the 6500 block of South Hamilton Avenue in Chicago—retail theft (2003)•Dorese L. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The European court held that there had been no such violation. 39           As the European court’s judgment in the Karakó case itself shows, in Petrina v Romania (Application No 78060/01) (unreported), given 14 October 2008, the court had confirmed, at para 19, that the right to protection of reputation is a right which, as an element of private life, falls within the scope of article 8 (“le droit à la protection de la … [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Although Davidoff says that so matter of factly that one might assume the claim is not contestable, in fact it's not at all clear that shareholders have "the ultimate choice of when to sell the company" and its perfectly clear (at least to me) that, as a matter of policy, they should not possess that right. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
May 4, 2018 Nealon, J.), Judge Terrence R. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Int’l Union, 239 F.3d 172 (2d Cir.2001); Kramer v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
In explaining the rationale for combining, the Examiner made this statement: Once it was known to provide such markings, the particular information one chooses to convey by using markings is seen to have been an obvious matter of choice. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Capital Int’l Sec., Inc., a 2006 decision, courts first assess whether two entities are joint employers; then they analyze whether the worker in question is an employee or independent contractor of that combined entity (if step one deems them joint employers), or of each entity individually (if it does not). [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm by Narine Bagdassarian
  Protect Yourself  I think we can all agree that it was just a matter of time before something like this came into being. [read post]