Search for: "People v J."
Results 4461 - 4480
of 7,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
&J. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm
In doing so, Judge Michael J. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Coverage includes reports by Adam Liptak of The New York Times and Sidney Rosdeitcher and James J. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm
Next up was Justice William J. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
From our much-admired former guest Kat and respected blogger Norman Siebrasse comes news that the IPKat has been judicially cited by Hughes J of the Federal Court of Canada in Pfizer Canada Inc v Pharmascience Inc 2013 FC 120 at paragraph 75, for the Kat's explanation of the "Angora cat" approach to claim construction (the cited url is not exactly right -- it says "com-uk" rather than "co.uk"). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
It “would allow people to collect damages from someone who photographs them in an offensive way during their personal or family time“, reports AP (at Politico). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 7:12 am
Federal form 1040-V, Payment Voucher (downloads as a pdf). [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 5:11 am
Ellis has posted "Polley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
See People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
Newey J rejected this argument as well. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Riggs v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:45 am
The Criminal Law Amendments suggested by the Justice Verma Committee are synopsised in a two-part guest post by Mrinal Satish and Shwetasree Majumder, who worked with the Committee. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
In order to be able to stop other people using the idea (without asking the person who first had it) the idea must have been new, and must not have been too easy for other people (even people who knew a lot about the area of the idea) to have arrived at, at the time when we first asked to be allowed to stop other people from using it without asking. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:01 pm
After the Advocate General gave his Opinion and the CJEU pronounced its ruling, back came the case for Arnold J to finish off. [read post]
