Search for: "People v Trump"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 4,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm
In particular, the Order encourages the Chair of the FTC to exercise the FTC’s statutory rulemaking authority in areas such as (i) unfair data collection and surveillance practices that may damage competition, consumer autonomy, and consumer privacy, (ii) unfair anticompetitive restrictions on third-party repair or self-repair of items, such as the restrictions imposed by powerful manufacturers that prevent farmers from repairing their own equipment; (iii) unfair anticompetitive conduct or… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:20 am
The decision in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
The Trump administration took a variety of actions that had the purpose or effect of making contraceptives less accessible to American women. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
Reported at Robert Ambrogi's Lawsites and The IllinoisTrial Practice Weblog.And now on with the rest of the submissions for this week's Blawg Review.The most highly talked about topic this past week was the Supreme Court's ruling on punitive damage awards in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:08 am
OK, you say, Ruminations has already told us about how notions of equity can trump contractual rights, so – where is this going? [read post]
22 May 2025, 2:58 pm
"] From today's majority opinion in Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm
It is a duty of care detached from its moorings (risk of objectively ascertainable physical injury) and then extended into a duty to prevent other people harming each other. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm
If you don’t do it, there might be consequences v. you must do it. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm
The answer is that we seem to worry about people being misled, and we seem to worry about their being misled about a number of things. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
Procedure shouldn't trump substance, in most instances. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
“The world will be watching for continued implementation of this agreement to feed people around the world with millions of tons of trapped Ukrainian grain. [read post]
30 May 2025, 11:27 am
In its unanimous decision issued on May 29, 2025, the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Sorrel v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
