Search for: "People v Trump" Results 4461 - 4480 of 4,681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 1:32 pm by Charlotte Butash, Benjamin Wittes
See Government’s Supplemental and Amended Sentencing Memorandum, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am by Sandy Levinson
   Although apparently some individual Amish vote--they appear to have been strong supporters of Donald Trump, as were the Satmars in Kiryat Joel, who gave him 99% of their votes (!) [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm by David Super
     All this radically differs from the all-powerful image that many people have of Senator McConnell. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 pm by Nathan
But what people want to be tough on is violent crime, against real victims, and maybe some extreme cases of massive economic crime against r [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm by Bona Law PC
In particular, the Order encourages the Chair of the FTC to exercise the FTC’s statutory rulemaking authority in areas such as (i) unfair data collection and surveillance practices that may damage competition, consumer autonomy, and consumer privacy, (ii) unfair anticompetitive restrictions on third-party repair or self-repair of items, such as the restrictions imposed by powerful manufacturers that prevent farmers from repairing their own equipment; (iii) unfair anticompetitive conduct or… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
Reported at Robert Ambrogi's Lawsites and The IllinoisTrial Practice Weblog.And now on with the rest of the submissions for this week's Blawg Review.The most highly talked about topic this past week was the Supreme Court's ruling on punitive damage awards in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:08 am by Ira Meislik
OK, you say, Ruminations has already told us about how notions of equity can trump contractual rights, so – where is this going? [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It is a duty of care detached from its moorings (risk of objectively ascertainable physical injury) and then extended into a duty to prevent other people harming each other. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Trump administration took a variety of actions that had the purpose or effect of making contraceptives less accessible to American women. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If you don’t do it, there might be consequences v. you must do it. [read post]