Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 4461 - 4480 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
When you read R. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:20 pm by Ilya Somin
Nonetheless, there is a danger they could apply it here, and thereby let Trump get away with a grave abuse of power that could potentially harm many thousands of people. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:30 am by war
VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd v B.M.W. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
It was aimed at people who believed in God and when the oil mixture was combined with prayer it would work to protect against and cure COVID – and he believed in the truth of claims he made for the mixture [9]. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
The Registry received sixteen letters or emails of support for the Petition and nine people objected [2]. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:01 am by Kevin Jon Heller
With regard to Austria, they emphasized that “armed bands of National Socialist SA and SS units” had taken control of the Austrian government even before German troops crossed the border. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
college students today seem not to embrace the basic notion that conservative speech that they find to be stigmatic, offensive, unsettling, and even infuriating must nonetheless be permitted to be uttered and heard on college campuses so long as it doesn’t cross the line into threats, harassment, or defamation. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Legal effect of uncertainty in the common general knowledge Much of the cross-examination and the judgment was devoted to these scientific issues and all the details are not reproduced here. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]