Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 6,181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm
The case is Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum (2d Cir. 2010), in which Nigerian plaintiffs seek to hold Royal Dutch/Shell liable for violating the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 9:29 am
If the defendant has made the motion solely based on written submissions (in this case, generally the written submissions would be affidavits from people who know about the issues related to jurisdiction), then "disputes of fact found in the affidavits are resolved in favor of plaintiff. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:45 am
The report is the typical whitewash rubbish produced by the Law Society of Scotland, illustrating that even when solicitors complain about their own regulatory & representative body, there is little impartiality on the Law Society’s part to investigate itself and actions which, according to several people in the know, were clearly backed by senior elements of the Law Society of Scotland, otherwise they simply wouldn't have been able to take place.Among many things the Law… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
See Baker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:02 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:47 pm
Justice O’Connor noted in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:14 pm
Vicarious liability applies to certain people who are not direct infringers. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am
Business people and their counsel need to take that into consideration when planning enforcement and defense of their IP. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:21 am
In Boyle v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Catching up on their emails, the IPKat and Merpel have just discovered news of yet another juicy trade mark dispute which the German Bundesgerichtshof has decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it's Case C-12/12, better known to people who can't even remember easy case numbers as Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court case from 1989: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:21 pm
(PFLAG) v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:12 pm
” Giblin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:20 am
Jones, Michigan Insurance Commissioner, April 10, 1978, Pages iv, 3; Shavers v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
The sole witness in the afternoon hearing was Paul Dacre. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
Bob cannot marry Colin solely because he is a man. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:12 am
In Jiminez v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
We do not live in a society where all the people share uniform religious beliefs. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:52 pm
California is a state with some 37 million people. [read post]
