Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 4461 - 4480 of 13,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The land was divided into two units: 608 acres of state park land (Washoe Meadows State Park), and the remainder designated as Lake Valley State Recreation Area to allow continuing operation of an existing golf course (a use not allowed in state parks). [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:29 am by Scott R. Anderson
The most notable example of this practice is the Supreme Court’s own 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARECONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUPlaintiff,v.THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTER STUDENT LOAN TRUST, et al.Defendants.C.A. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 5:59 am by Joy Waltemath
The court reserved until a later date any ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Vidal v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Grant
Military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri continued Nov. 7 with military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
    The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
    The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at the Huffington Post, Hannah Riley asserts that the cert petition in Hidalgo v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, attorneys from the Paul Weiss law firm review a recent Second Circuit decision on this issue, Waggoner v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
2017-10-05 Herrera Cert Petition Question presented: Whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians’ 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States,” thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]