Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 4461 - 4480 of 7,625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
At ACSblog, John Blume weighs in on Hall v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by John Bursch
  In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:04 am by Amy Howe
Virginia, striking down the state’s ban on interracial marriages. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am by Amy Howe
Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr outlines “some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider” in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
In round one, the plaintiffs moved to preclude testimony by the defendants’ expert appraiser based on a disclosure statement (sans written report) that identified the appraiser, and stated that he would testify as to the “business value” of the subject company pursuant to “standard valuation methods and procedures. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
A v British Broadcasting Corporation, 22 and 23 January 2014 (Supreme Court) Ontulmus v Collett 5 and 6 February 2014 (Tugendhat J) NAB v Serco, 7 February 2014 (Bean J) [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur examines the extent to which the lower courts have relied on last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Preliminary Round #2 Q1: In the famous patentable subject matter case of Diamond v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
 Writing for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the effect that the Court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Houston Court of Appeals issued an opinion in 1996, in the case styled, "Schulz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  According to the Springfield State Journal-Register, Illinois lawyers have staged a series of mock trials to raise funds to preserve five rare maps and preserve portraits of state supreme court justices. [read post]