Search for: "STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! "
Results 4461 - 4480
of 9,522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
But so long as it is cold outside, why not curl up somewhere warm with a little light government contracts reading? [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 10:05 pm
Among the things that stand out: It appears he is not giving up his white coat, as at least twice he’s gone on “Grand Rounds” at famous Boston hospitals, Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
The case eventually bubbled up to the Supremes. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:49 am
A dissertation chapter may be submitted, but we strongly suggest that it be edited so that it stands alone as a piece of work with its own integrity. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:08 pm
The hospital also treated and released Mason, but police picked her up right away. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:12 am
That said, because there are many ways to set up such a system, I don't necessarily recommend the CA vendor over others - I don't know enough about the players in the market or their products. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
BIDZ.com, Inc., which ruled that a non-California resident has standing only if (1) the injury occurred in California, or (2) the defendant’s alleged misconduct transpired in California. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 10:03 pm
Among them are California, Idaho and Pennsylvania. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
In California, under California Vehicle Code 20002, police could charge Lloyd with Hit & Run Causing Injury. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Related posts: Court Says Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Pursue Failure-to-Purge Claim Under the VPPA – Sterk v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am
In an op-ed for the Washington Times, Paul Moreno contends that, although supporters of affirmative action argue that the policy fulfills “a pro-affirmative action vision of the 14th Amendment,” “that claim is merely the latest example of academics resting their advocacy of liberal social policies on scholarship that does not stand up. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:34 pm
Authored by Patty LeeThe countdown begins to receiving some clarity on the suitable seating rule from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:08 am
This is backed up by their argument that there is nothing unreasonable about granting standing to animals, referring to the lack of definition of a human requirement, and the possibility of affording copyright to corporations (i.e. non-human entities).Bobo finally had an avenue of protection for his vast collection of pictures of bananasThis case has now been resolved, with a clear rejection by Judge Orrick who presided over the case. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:05 am
Only a tiny number of people exposed by leaks end up paying any costs, and for the rare victims who do, the average cost has actually been falling steadily. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:59 pm
Both of these job positions involve standing for long periods of time. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
California has a statute applicable to dating contracts that gives consumers the right to cancel within 3 days of signing up. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 5:54 am
If you don’t open the mail, you don’t really know where you stand with your creditors. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:35 pm
Samsung seeks to overturn $120 million Apple verdict: Yesterday, Samsung was been trying to convince the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to overturn a May 2014 verdict from a California federal court ordering it to cough up $119.6 million for infringing three patents. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:29 pm
Copyright: victorias / 123RF Stock Photo We’ve been writing about California’s suitable seating requirements for over five years and are still waiting for a grown up in authority to tell us what the law means. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
Corporate business competitors asserting economic or commercial (rather than environmental) interests nonetheless have traditional “beneficial interest” standing which is sufficient to seek CEQA relief, and moreover are not subject to any heightened standing hurdles or scrutiny when claiming “public interest standing,” which is an exception to the normal beneficial interest requirement. [read post]
