Search for: "STATE v. COLORADO"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 4,900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2009, 10:01 am
Growth v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:14 am
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:08 pm
By Eric Goldman Health Grades, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
District Court in Colorado decided the first case post-Pyett (blogged here). [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:26 am
Watch Tribal Rights in Education Nationally and in Your State Melody McCoy | Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado Watch Tribal Tax Planning for Construction and Other Projects After Barona v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
In Jayne Dunnum v Dept of Employee Trust Funds, Wisconsin's Dane County Circuit Court ruled (at page 28) that the new law does not violate the state's "super DOMA" amendment. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
--Court: Court of Appeals of Colorado, Division OneOpinion Date: 6/25/09Cite: DISH Network Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:28 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ColoradoOpinion Date: 6/12/09Cite: Haggard v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:06 am
The ruling, in Grammar v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:15 am
State (cited above) and Russeau v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 5:03 am
In the case Christman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:06 pm
On the other hand, federal control of building codes provide uniformity across the country for a problem which does not respect state and local borders, prevents local challenges to individual energy efficiency efforts (like AHRI v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:48 am
On the other hand, federal control of building codes provide uniformity across the country for a problem which does not respect state and local borders, prevents local challenges to individual energy efficiency efforts (like AHRI v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 10:28 am
The Supreme Court today decided Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Indiana Secretary of State filed a complaint against Aaron V. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:46 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:41 pm
Such is the case with Lima v. [read post]
