Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 4461 - 4480 of 6,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 2:06 pm
The relationship between fraud and injury was too attenuated.Link Between Fraud and InjuryThe City’s claim suffered from the same defect that plagued the plaintiff’s claim in Anza v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
” Stile v C-Air Customhouse Brokers-Forwards, Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/836779.no2.pdf State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IAM)   United Kingdom EWHC (Admin) holds defendant’s acquisition of illegally copied audio files would constitute an offence under s. 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Sitek v Circuit Court of Swidnica (1709 Copyright Blog) IPO – Original Bucks Fizz members lose trade mark battle over name (Out-Law) (IPKat) Should the UK facilitate online filing of registered design applications? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:32 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees cited the California Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The questionnaire should also solicit information about any “golden handcuff” arrangements, whereby the nominating stockholder or its affiliates will reward the nominee for achieving a particular result as a director (e.g., sale of the corporation, stock price increase, or implementation [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by David Nagode
The Conseil d’État’s first referred question is whether the terminology of butchery, charcuterie and fish sectors is harmonised at Union level. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 6:25 am
  Bitsy asked HR when she would be getting her promotion, but the V.P. of Sales affirmed Tom’s judgment that she was not qualified for such a promotion. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
After a single justice of this court allowed the Commonwealth’s application for an interlocutory appeal, we granted the defendant’s application for direct appellate review in order to decide an issue of first impression concerning the impact, if any, G.L. c. 94C, §§ 32L-32N, inserted by St.2008, c. 387, §§ 2-4, which decriminalized possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, has on certain aspects of our search and seizure… [read post]