Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 7,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
The judge also notes that this “is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
For example, in discussing Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am
2011 NY Slip Op 21015 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:39 pm
In Romer v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:42 pm
Take for example the recent Alberta decisions in Ledcor Construction Limited v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Company. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
In Armstrong v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:38 am
One notable decision issued since I wrote my paper is Morris v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Pa. 2012); Steele v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
The legitimacy of presidential constitutionalism is frequently debated, most recently in the context of President Obama’s refusal to defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Splitting the Baby: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Young v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
The Indiana law does both of these, although its core provisions establishing the strict scrutiny test for substantial burdens on the exercise of religion are the same as the federal law’s. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:21 am
With Balkin, Alicea characterizes me as a “living constitutionalist” or dangerously close: At its core, living constitutionalism is about forcing the Constitution to conform to the will of the living, whether “the living” is defined as society at large or a subgroup upon whom the living constitutionalist would confer power. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:41 am
Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog: At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 3:10 pm
Michigan State won the game 76-70. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
He worries that the combination of secrecy and the FDA rules regarding generic drug entry may make it even harder for generic drug companies to enter the market than patents do, and may restrict the benefits of public disclosure of ideas. [10] I am less worried about a shift to trade secrecy than he is, in part because I think secrecy is a lot less airtight in the modern world than one might suspect, [11] and in part because I think the benefits of public disclosure from patents are… [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:57 pm
. **************************************** They may be based in North Korea, Russia, China, or the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
