Search for: "State v. Grow"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 7,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Thomas (5th Cir. 1981) (holding that any rights that "grow[ ] out of an expungement order … are not … privacy rights entitled to constitutional protection"); Nilson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Hollis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:00 pm
Doe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Henry , No. 07-4578, 07-4587 Denial of defendants' motions to dismiss their indictment related to marijuana growing is reversed, and their convictions and sentences vacated and remanded where the continuance of trial for 103 days could not be excluded from defendant's speedy trial clock, which caused the total delay in defendant's case to exceed the seventy days allowed by the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 3:30 am
The contract provided for a 10% contingent fee and stated, “For such service (I) we hereby assign HAC the above amount due, or to grow by reason of such claim(s). [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:52 pm
Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:23 pm
Those under 35 are much more supportive than those over 65 of civil unions (62% v. 40%), gay adoption 65% v. 40%), and openly gay political candidates (60% v. 35%). [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:09 pm
The backlog will continue to grow if this Court is unable to address the proportionality principle until next Term. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:55 am
Murdoch v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:53 am
In Viers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:01 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall noted in McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
AFSCME overruled the court’s 1977 decision in Abood v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:24 pm
State Crime Victims Bd., 502 U.S. 105, 116 (1991). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Part II consists of papers by Osofsky on Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:57 pm
Terry v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:56 am
The post-trial, post-damages-ruling procedures in the first Apple v. [read post]
