Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 13,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2009, 12:22 pm
In Walton County v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
In State Dep't of Transportation v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:12 am
Facts: This case (Ulibarri v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:30 pm
In Mauna Kea Anaina Hou et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
Burke Engineering, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 5:33 am
” Safe Harbor Retreat, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:05 am
Nash (Tribal Enrollment) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlMichelle M. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:52 am
In Rat Pack v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:29 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Horne v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:04 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:08 am
See Oswalt v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
On June 23, 2021, the United States Supreme Court held in a 6-3 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 10:07 pm
Glick v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
"Where evidentiary material is submitted on a CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion, it may be considered by the court, but unless the defendant demonstrates, without significant dispute, that a material fact alleged by the complaint is not a fact at all, the motion will not be granted" (Quesada v Global Land, Inc., 35 AD3d 575, 576; see Caravousanos v Kings County Hosp., 74 AD3d 716). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:49 am
"Where evidentiary material is submitted on a CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion, it may be considered by the court, but unless the defendant demonstrates, without significant dispute, that a material fact alleged by the complaint is not a fact at all, the motion will not be granted" (Quesada v Global Land, Inc., 35 AD3d 575, 576; see Caravousanos v Kings County Hosp., 74 AD3d 716). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:37 pm
Since the statute of limitations is intended to give defendants "the protections of predictability and promptness" (quoting United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 11:22 pm
This agreement provides that, with limited exceptions, individuals who first enter either Canada or the United States and then attempt to cross a land border into the other country in order to lodge an asylum claim must be returned to claim asylum in the first country they entered. [read post]
