Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 4461 - 4480 of 25,478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2011, 5:02 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 “We’ve had conversations (where he said), ‘I do not want to live on a machine, that’s not living,’” James Barnes testified. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
State, No. 101,508 (Johnson)K.S.A. 21-2512 appealElizabeth Seale CateforisDenial of new trial after DNA testingMarc Thompson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Current U.S. territories Although the United States prefers to see itself as a “republic,” the result of this self-deception has been costly for people in the colonies: The logo map has relegated them to the shadows, which are a dangerous place to live. [read post]
If you want to have an abortion but are living in a country where it's illegal, you might as well be living in pre-Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:51 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
This leaves 33 million women undergoing unsafe abortions, their lives put at risk because laws restrict access to safe abortion services. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 10:36 am
The Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure's general rule of venue states that a defendant must be sued in the parish where he is domiciled (where he lives). [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
Both lived there until 1993 when their relationship ended. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:44 am by Judge Bonnie Sudderth
For a native Texan like me, folks don’t have to live outside the 50 states to be considered foreigners. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 10:00 am by John Baker
Nevertheless, the Census Bureau has given every foreign national living in the United States political representation equal to that of American citizens under age 18. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Div. 2015)           Following the recent opinion in State v. [read post]
The GPS monitoring program requires the plaintiffs to comply with GPS monitoring “for the rest of their lives unless they permanently move to a different state. [read post]