Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 11,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am
This was the first federal appeals court decision to interpret the scope of the Supreme Court’s decision a year ago in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:35 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:39 pm
Related posts:Povse v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 9:22 am
Holman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
First, the Project involves a series of decisions promoting state collateral review as the “main event” for post-conviction challenges. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:33 pm
Yousoufian v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
In Metzler Investment GMBH v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
In Lambrecht v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:49 am
Kuroda v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:50 am
Placzek v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
All the other cases were decided under Step One or under an exception, such as United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
In circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, it must thus be held that the occurrence of damage and/or the likelihood of its occurrence arise from the accessibility in the Member State of the referring court, [i.e. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 12:52 pm
See Intamin Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm
Although there was a drop off in such cases for the 2017 term, the court heard several salient patent cases last term as well, with Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 12:07 pm
Thus, in Dodge v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
As he pointed out, if the New Jersey District Court had had to construe the 1955 agreement, it would not have applied federal common law principles: US contract law varied from state to state and there was no nationwide federal contract law available to apply. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 11:07 pm
(Will Baude) On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Atlantic Marine v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
One of the main divisive issues the courts face is how to handle the issue of evidence of "insurance" at trial. [read post]
