Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 4461 - 4480
of 7,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 2:09 pm
The Fourth Department, in Clark v Boreanaz also allowed a modification proceeding to continue in New York under Domestic Relations Law § 75-d (1) (b) even though New York was not the child's home State. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded after rejecting both of the District Court's grounds. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
Agent G states in the Criminal Complaint that he reviewed a letter sent to A at her home, postmarked 20 October 2008, which stated in part: “I remember our past experiences together so fondly. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:39 pm
Prochilo and People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:08 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:08 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:29 am
As deliberated above and ruled by the court in June of last year, New York State was C's home state at the time A commenced this proceeding. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:31 am
The Fourth Department, in Clark v Boreanaz also allowed a modification proceeding to continue in New York under Domestic Relations Law § 75-d (1) (b) even though New York was not the child's home State. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:25 am
As a result, the District Court was obliged to apply the Supreme Court’s 1964 ruling in Brulotte v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Services, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:14 pm
The Law Offices of Stephen Neyman is dedicated to defending the accused. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:14 pm
The Law Offices of Stephen Neyman is dedicated to defending the accused. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:24 pm
Co., 1976, and Liffman v Brooke, 1st Dept 1977. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm
The court rejected, as contrary to the statutory language and logic, the interpretation of CPL 20.10 (4) advanced in the landmark case of People v Puig that the term "community welfare" applied only to CPL 20.40, the county venue statute, and not to CPL 20.20, the State jurisdiction statute. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Fischer (2005, 2011) Thinking Like a Writer: A Lawyer’s Guide to Writing and Editing, by Steven V. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:41 pm
This is clearly stated in CPL 710.40[2]. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
L. 291 (2013) and Stephen C. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Stephen Hackeling in Drost v. [read post]
