Search for: "Steven Powers" Results 4461 - 4480 of 5,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2021, 2:51 pm by Sanjana
Politicians and their powerful proxies are now far more adept at instrumentalising social media for partisan or parochial gain than civil society for rights-based advocacy. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The one thing that is absolutely clear about Holmes is that she excels at attracting powerful supporters. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 9:14 am
Rupert Murdoch now has more power over the dissemination of news than William Randolph Hearst ever did. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:54 pm
The case involved about as naked an abuse of government power as could be imagined. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
As Justice Stevens argued in dissent, “whereas we have no evidence to support the notion that the Framers would have wanted corporations to have the same rights as natural persons in the electoral context, we have ample evidence to suggest that they would have been appalled by the evidence of corruption that Congress unearthed in developing BCRA and that the Court today discounts to irrelevance. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:58 pm by Josh Blackman
Griswold (1870), the Court held that Congress lacked the power to require people to accept paper currency as legal tender. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie previews the hearing. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:26 am
The decision was nearly unanimous; Justice Stevens concluded that the statute didn’t apply to such protests, and thus didn’t think it necessary to reach the constitutional question. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Thirdly, the wording of s 39 that led this court and the Court of Appeal to conclude in JC that it does not confer power to grant anonymity into adulthood remains. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:04 am by Lawrence Solum
” Here is how Rawls states the principle: [O]ur exercise of political power is fully proper only when it is exercised in accordance with a constitution the essentials of which all citizens as free and equal may reasonably be expected to endorse in the light of principles and ideals acceptable to their common human reason. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
Rather, federalism secures to citizens the liberties that derive from the diffusion of sovereign power. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
Richman and Steven L. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:51 am by Stephen Wermiel
The ACLU brief argues that the power claimed by the government under the Stolen Valor Act would provide “sweeping power to control and censor public debate. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Douglass went on to deny that the Constitution guaranteed the right to hold property in man, avowing his belief that the way to abolish slavery in America was to vote such men into power who would use their powers for the abolition of slavery. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:14 pm by David Lat
Justice Department [New York Law Journal] The 10 Most Powerful Partners At Cravath [Business Insider / Law Review]Earlier: Open Thread: What’s Your Net Worth? [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 3:02 pm by Lawrence Solum
” Here is how Rawls states the principle: [O]ur exercise of political power is fully proper only when it is exercised in accordance with a constitution the essentials of which all citizens as free and equal may reasonably be expected to endorse in the light of principles and ideals acceptable to their common human reason. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:14 am by Jonathan H. Adler
  Professor Teachout said yes, and that Buckley should be overturned (which was also Justice Stevens’ [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Stevens criticized Scalia with a charge of hypocrisy: why would an originalist look at history that came after the Second Amendment's adoption? [read post]