Search for: "Steven Powers"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 5,851
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2010, 9:37 am
Rumsfeld, Justice Stevens wrote: All parties agree that Colonel Winthrop? [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:27 am
Marc Cooper writes in today's Fish Wrapper that the right pick to the Supreme Court to replace John Paul Stevens would be an open atheist. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:39 pm
” It is true that while Stevens has unapologetically taken on the complexities of interpreting the Constitution, Justice Scalia has had great success in exploiting the rhetorical power of “rules” and “textualism. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:10 am
Your documentary seems especially timely now, with the impending nomination of Justice Stevens’ successor. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:00 am
" And finally, don't underestimate your own firm's market power. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
Stevens quoted various Supreme Court decisions as stating; Thus, we have repeatedly reaffirmed that the power to discharge the jury prior to verdict should be reserved for “extraordinary and striking circumstances,” . . . [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
But starting with Justice Stevens’ powerful decision in Atkins, the Court found that the democratically revealed moral center of gravity had shifted away from death more recently. [read post]
1 May 2010, 10:54 pm
URL Priority Change Frequency LastChange http://www.jacksonlaws.com/ 100% Daily 2010-05-02 03:37 http://www.jacksonlaws.com/georgia 90% Daily 2010-05-02 03:31 http://www.jacksonlaws.com/mcdonough-divorce-henry-county 90% Daily 2010-05-02 03:30 http://www.jacksonlaws.com/blog 90% Daily 2010-05-02 03:28 http://www.jacksonlaws.com/mcdonough-divorce-henry-county/georgia-uncontested-divorce 90% Daily 2010-05-02 03:27 … [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:24 am
Pinker criticizes the extreme metaphor metaphor (as I have, using a slightly different metaphor), but nevertheless is taken (as am I) by its seeming explanatory power in many cases. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
This policy predisposition toward recovery has been a powerful stimulus for the involvement of financial investors in the bankruptcy process, which in turn has attracted liquidity that has itself fostered the reorganization of troubled businesses. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
The court of appeals affirmed the trial court in Estate of Ronald Steven Blair. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:49 pm
Steven Davidoff, author of The Deal Professor column at The New York Times DealBook Blog, and other publications, who teaches at the University of Connecticut School of Law, provided a presentation entitled: Form Over Substance? [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:53 am
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Stevens and Breyer. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Yesterday David Savage had a piece in the Los Angeles Times about three of the potential nominees – Garland, Kagan, and Wood – and their views of executive power. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
” Justice Stevens has not expressed strong opinions. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
Here is the abstract: The recent announcement of Justice John Paul Stevens that he would retire at the end of the October 2009 Term has instigated the typical media frenzy of shortlists and speculation regarding the identity of the next nominee to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:28 am
(Justice Ginsberg’s dissent, joined by Justices Stevens and Breyer, questioned not only the level of scrutiny applied by the majority but, moreover, the ripeness of the matter for judicial action.) [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:25 pm
In response to questioning from Justice Stevens, Silverberg conceded that, in cases in which a single provision of the contract could be stricken for unconscionability while preserving the rest of the contract, an arbitrator could decide this question. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
In so doing, he shreds the “parchment barriers” established by our Founders; he forgets, as Steven Pinker has noted: Someone must be empowered to make decisions and enforce laws, and that someone is inherently vulnerable to corruption. [read post]
