Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 4,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
It's something that the California Supreme Court didn't allow in Merrill v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 10:49 am
Don't they realize that they are taking up sides against Alaska children? [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
Circuit in its FTC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
So if you want the particulars of each and every little regulatory hoop the FDA has set up, see ya.Well, there's that, and the fact that we were busy and couldn't get around to it until now, so they basically scooped us. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
A156
Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation necessary to implement the public protection and general government budget for the 2009 - 2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
California is hardly alone in having consumer protection laws that require a lesser standard than fraud. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
(Techdirt) US Copyright Office seeking comments on proposed exempted classes of works (Daily Dose of IP) Lawrence Lessig opinion article: Don’t make kids online crooks (ContentAgenda) BitTorrent as marketing tool, nominated for an interactive award (TorrentFreak) Copyright laws are working – tale of two creators (ContentAgenda) Developing decent digital distribution solutions – Part III (Ip's What's Up) US Copyright - Decisions… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
As an aside, Trevor referred to the Consumer Protection Bill and mentioned that the reference to "electronic transactions" suggests that the Consumer Protection Bill applies to website terms and conditions as falling under the rubric of an "electronic transaction" and introduces a series of requirements that he argues would mitigate against a 23 page legal document in favour of something much simpler. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
They don’t know very much about irradiation, or how it would benefit them. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:15 pm
Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
Euro-Pro Operating LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango) Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46) Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
See Discount Consumer Protection Act, S. 2261. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
In the Insurance Department's view, same-sex and opposite-sex legal spouses are similarly situated for purposes of construing the Insurance Law, a principal aim of which is to ensure that all consumers have a fair opportunity to purchase appropriate protection against risk. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
The last process I do before giving up is to search the web site using the firm's search tool (or Google if the firm doesn't have a search tool.) [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:38 am
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:04 am
For a long time the Golden State had a consumer protection statute that was really bizarre - like you-didn't-even-have-to-use-the-product-to-sue type bizarre. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:00 pm
(We don't make this stuff up. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:21 pm
By Eric Goldman Jones Day v. [read post]
