Search for: "THOMAS V DEFENSE"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 4,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Pix Credit: Michael A. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
Windsor, striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:58 pm
District Court Judge Thomas A. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
In consequence of which irregular conduct of the said Samuel Chase, as dangerous to our liberties as it is novel to our laws and usages, the said John Fries was deprived of the right, secured to him by the eighth article amendatory of the Constitution, and was condemned to death without having been heard by counsel, in his defense, to the disgrace of the character of the American bench, in manifest violation of law and justice, and in open contempt of the right of juries, on which… [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
DPADR also describe it as a manifestation of the rise of what Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek have termed the “policy state”: a mode of governance emphasizing discretionary choice among policy options rather than constitutional rights and structures.[11] As indicated by the fate of President Biden’s student debt policies, debt relief can still trigger constitutional objections, but these tend to be couched as statutory interpretations rather then defenses of… [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
(Pix credit: Marc Frank for Reuters) Even as the United States retreated from direct economic connections with Cuba, the European Union sought to step into the space left by the American action. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
That Kennedy would deem it acceptable to be replaced by someone whom Trump will select based on the recommendations of the extremists who have taken over the party (and who gave the world a second Clarence Thomas in the person of Neil Gorsuch) is absolutely astonishing. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am
Ministry of Defense’s latest intelligence update. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
Wednesday, Jan. 15, 11:30 a.m.: The Atlantic Council will hold a conversation with Nabeel Khoury, a nonresident senior fellow, and Thomas L. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
I attended oral arguments in the case Snyder v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Key Strategic Objectives from Pillars 1, 3 and 4 Pillar 1: Defend Critical Infrastructure This pillar is aimed at ensuring that the owners and operators of critical infrastructure as well as their vendors, service providers and applicable federal agency partners and regulators collaborate so that U.S. infrastructure is defensible and resilient against cybersecurity attacks. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Poisoned Flowers (Finding Superman in Cyberspace), Thomas C. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm
Here's a marvelous example of "denying the theory assumption," from Dan Farber, himself famous for this move:The last ditch defense of the rational choice theory is to insist that it takes a theory to beat a theory, and that the behavioralists have only assembled a collection of empirical regularities without any unifying theory. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
For Green's lawyer, the decision from the 3rd Circuit in Green v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:33 am
Here's a marvelous example of "denying the theory assumption," from Dan Farber, himself famous for this move:The last ditch defense of the rational choice theory is to insist that it takes a theory to beat a theory, and that the behavioralists have only assembled a collection of empirical regularities without any unifying theory. [read post]
