Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 4461 - 4480 of 51,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 7:08 am by Docket Navigator
Given the Supreme Court’s narrow interpretation of the terms 'action' and 'complaint' in [BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
Given that the electric was counted twice, and there was no basis in the record for the additional $645,970.74 awarded, the AT2 lowered the “past rent” sum to $1,099,481.26.And because “accelerated” or “future” rent isn't recoverable in a summary proceeding, the AT2 also deleted that sum from the judgment and thereby reduced the lessor’s total recovery to $1,231,800.75.The AT2 sure burned through that landlord's cash ….# #… [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:51 am by Jon Sands
" Using factors set forth in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:49 am
Using the police department's computer records, detectives learned that the other number was Appellant's. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:57 am by Brendan Holland
  DWT's First Amendment experts have now taken a closer look at the Court's decision in Fox Television Stations v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
Kappos, the case that seemingly re-started us down this pathway. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by Viking
  While not exactly addressing this issue, NMCCA has come close and has a useful discussion of how similar context evidence is not admissible. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
 On appeal, the Court of Appeal held that it was not clear whether, if notice was not given, the products imported until notice was given should be considered infringements with the consequence that the importer must pay damages or render an account of profits. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 1:35 pm
Here, none of the reasons given by the landlord for refusing consent related to Mrs Williams' disability. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:41 am
Summary of Decision issued June 29, 2007[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses "Universal Citation" and was given an "official" citation when issued. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is an almost ironclad requirement that experts be used in legal malpractice settings, either to state the standard of ordinary rasonable skill and knowledge commonl possessed by an attorney. [read post]