Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 9,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2009, 7:34 am
United States, 510 U.S. 163 (1994), which is “whether the factors militating in favor of [the proposed rule] are so extraordinarily weighty as to overcome the balance struck by Congress. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:10 am
That case asks the exact parallel question of "Whether the initial authorized sale outside the United States of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item." [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:23 am
The courts are still able to smoke out some the fast ones that law enforcement will pull in trying to get a suspect to make an admissible confession.The case is United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 12:13 pm
Wakefern Food Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 8:04 am
According to the United States Supreme Court, such an instruction improperly shifts the Commonwealth’s burden of persuasion regarding whether, upon weighing the evidence, the jury believes willful concealment is evidence of intent to convert or defraud. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (PDF), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit joined other courts in rejecting the "any exposure is a substantial factor" theory. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:20 am
In 2015, Congress enacted the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (34 USC§ 20144) which establishes the Fund to provide compensation to certain people who are injured in or by acts of international state-sponsored terrorism, and who obtain a judgment issued by a United States district court under state or federal law against a foreign state that was designated as a state sponsor of… [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
On June 26, 2015 the Supreme Court of the United States, in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
Ultimately, the antitrust laws are meant to benefit consumers.The PI order gives both parties some guidance as to where they bear the burden of proof and on what aspects of the case they must do more going forward. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:54 am
[Morales v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2005, 2:55 pm
Alvarez-Machain and the Second Circuit in Flores v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm
United States, 96 Ct. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
It annexes to its moving papers a copy of the June 24, 2016 Loft Board letter to Plaintiff stating that the harassment finding remained in place and the second and fifth floor units were still subject to rent regulation under the Loft Law (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:57 am
" United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
First, it states the “sense of Congress” that the president “shall not withdraw the United States from NATO,” and that “the case Goldwater v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
At the core is a narrative inversion--for to some extent one might be excused if one sees in this drama a greater one (and one deeply satisfying for some): the collective reconstruction of peoples who suffered great tragedy at the hands of other peoples (only one of whom was burdened with its responsibility in the case of one of the parties) now by a process of psychological necessary becomes the very thing responsible for its tragedy. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
