Search for: "United States v. Cooper"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 4,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2007, 8:29 am
" See United States v Larson, __ F.3d. __, 2007 WL 2192256 (9th Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 721 F.2d 1305, 1314-15 (Fed.Cir.1983); Ammex, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Murchison contends that the United States breached the plea agreement when it failed to inform the district court as to her cooperation. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 5:49 am
As an agent, the trustee holds bare legal title.In 1993, the legislature added the definition of "owner" to the Section 189A:"Owner", any person who alone or jointly or severally with others (i) has legal title to any premises; (ii) has charge or control of any premises as an agent who has authority to expend money for compliance with the state sanitary code, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian of the estate or the holder of legal title; (iii) is an estate or… [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 5:40 pm
In Jurney v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:04 am
It stated that cooperation with the Government's investigation was a factor to be considered. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:14 am
" United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
It's an obligation when they take that oath to faithfully uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. . . . [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 4:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 4:50 am
" United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:45 pm
MSRP policies are lawful under United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Indeed, especially here in the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 5:04 am
In UNITED STATES v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
The United States patent was granted on 7 July 1998. [read post]
