Search for: "United States v. Texas" Results 4461 - 4480 of 8,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2018, 7:32 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The word mark “WINNING ISN’T NORMAL” has also been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office with Registration No. 4630749 for printed matter. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by SHG
The United States, thanks to Alabama, just joined that list. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
A claimant who merely “does business in this state” and accesses platforms from another state (or country, perhaps) can still sue platforms for not following Texas's rules. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
Barrett marks the seventy-fifth anniversary of Harlan Fiske Stone’s ascension to the position of Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:44 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, issued an opinion on June 29, 2011, in the case styled, Cheryl Likens v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm by Amy Howe
United States: Whether road culverts that reduce fish habitat in Washington state violate Native American fishing rights guaranteed by treaty. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
Representing the United States will be Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:22 am
Part V concludes with the problem of false constitutional necessity. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:56 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is illustrated in the 2005, Waco Court of Appeals opinion styled, United States Fire insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:53 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case was decided by the United States District Court, Southern District, Judge Lynn N. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:45 am by Matthew Bush
United States (2005).Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioner Segal v. [read post]