Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Sims has statues and hospitals named after him, but we don't know the names of the women who also, unwillingly, helped us get the benefits he did provide. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Second Circuit (unpublished): All the key facts are disputed, so we don't have jurisdiction to decide before trial whether the officers get immunity. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:55 am
Nields wins.Proposition 2: Kuehne's actions were not "necessary" to Ochoa's representation, and therefore don't deserve 1957(f)(1) protection. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Given the various preemption criteria set out in Levine, we don't expect to see many preemption motions brought in prescription drug cases before the summary judgment stage - which means after substantial discovery. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 9:19 pm
" We've come a long way since then. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:39 am
One gun-toting volunteer explained that while "we definitely don't agree with the looting, but we do agree with the cause for protests. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 6:27 am
This is the language of notice pleading, not, as in Ortloff, of fact pleading, notice pleading being all that is required of claims that don't fall within the scope of Rule 9(b). [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 8:20 am
What right have we to believe in corporations if we don't believe in angels? [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 5:47 pm
What right have we to believe in corporations if we don't believe in angels? [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:18 am
The answer was no.So victims can object to punishment, address the court about a defendant, be advised about the proceeding and more or less be treated well: They just don't have the right to tell the court that the prosecution ought not to take place at all. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
They don't like that. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:40 am
So, for example, one of the claims made by reformers is that voters don’t know what they are doing. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm
There is no solution that is consistent with the Constitution.In part, this isn't the Galloway court's fault. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:41 am
We just don't know. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:32 am
But as I wrote in responding to such arguments in the Angelos case, disproportionate sentences can produce an overarching harm of reducing respect for our justice system: The problem with this simplistic position [that if you "can't do the time don't do the crime] is that it overlooks other interests that are inevitably involved in the imposition of a criminal sentence. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
McKenna, University of Notre Dame Law School, Trademark Defenses That Aren't Confusion test isn’t working. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 1:55 pm
Strangely, I don't anticipate an outcry from conservative bloggers about convicting people on a technicality. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm
From a purely narrow, selfish perspective, we can't wait to see the well-intended results. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:26 am
I don't think I've done something wrong by being a private practitioner. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:32 am
UPDATE 3: Ron Coleman says: "Defendants don’t get their fees. [read post]
