Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 4461 - 4480 of 19,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2015, 6:17 am
Yes, say two judges on a Washington Court of Appeals panel, in last week’s State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am by Joel R. Brandes
On the contrary, it provides that ‘[e]xcept when express provision therefor is made either in a statute of the United States or in these rules,’ the cost-shifting to the prevailing party otherwise applies to all cases. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:39 am by Suzanne Ito
In 2009, a judge in New York dismissed the suit on the grounds that the ACLU's clients — coalition of attorneys and human rights, labor, legal and media organizations whose work requires them to engage in sensitive and sometimes privileged telephone and e-mail communications with individuals located outside the United States — couldn't prove that their communications would be monitored under the new law. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Lockwood Reexamination Gripe Goes Nowhere As discussed last week, the case of Lockwood v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Last week was the busiest in the IPKat's history, with a total of 29 blogposts. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by John Elwood
This week finally answered our questions about what was going on with Azar v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:42 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
Last week, noted sportswriter Sally Jenkins used her Washington Post column to ask why the United States government was devoting so many resources to the prosecution of baseball star Barry Bonds. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:24 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Ann McGinley analyzes last week’s decision in Young v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am by Florian Mueller
Shopping apps like Amazon or parking apps (I just used one a couple of weeks ago) are also allowed to use their own payment systems. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:36 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  See R.C.M. 705(c)(1)(B) (“A term or condition in a pretrial agreement shall not be enforced if it deprives the accused of: . . . the complete and effective exercise of post-trial and appellate rights”); see also United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 2:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
  These and other petitions of the week are below: Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Ronald Mann
The justices will be taking a trip back to Federal Courts class when they hear arguments next week in Lightfoot v Cendant Mortgage Corp. [read post]