Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 8,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
In Al-Bihani v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm
Most states have split executive branches, with chief election officials (e.g., secretaries of state) who are separately elected. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
” (Amway Global v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 10:41 am
Visually Impaired Juror Challenged The Court of Special Appeals in Maryland rendered an opinion in Tremayne Lewis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Two years later, the Court followed this up in Pierce v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:59 pm
To state the obvious, such legislation would be contrary not only to Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
They possess a “unique responsibility” to pursue justice, as the Supreme Court stated in the 1987 case of Young v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The decision in Perez v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:04 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:39 am
Circuit’s ruling in the Jefferson case, known as USA v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:57 pm
[A Harvard Law Review Note argues that judicial restraint is an "originalist value"] The Harvard Law Review published an unsigned student note on Young v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:04 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
Citing DHS v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 1:23 pm
This will result in all of the branches of state government agreeing on how to resolve the question, and therefore it will greatly enhance the democratic legitimacy of the ultimate result.Although the Vermont decision in Baker v. [read post]
