Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 13,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2022, 4:36 pm
Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:12 am
24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:05 am
Discipline settlementsSills v Keric, NYS Supreme Court, Ia Part 30, Justice Heitler, affd, 5 A.D.3d 247, appeal denied 3 NY3d 610 New York City police officer Edward Sills was terminated from his position pursuant to a "Terminate Probation Agreement" that he had signed to settle an earlier disciplinary action. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:53 am
The federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a decision in Forest Grove School District v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:49 pm
What the Court said at 248 N.Y. page 72 at 161 N.E. page 423 of Raymond v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:02 pm
-EV] [V.] [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Into my office came Jobs by Walter Isaacson, Barack Obama: The Story, by David Maraniss, and on and on. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:59 am
” The appointing authority adopted the findings of the hearing officer and imposed the penalty recommended by the hearing officer: termination. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
Court of Appeals Decision; Stengel v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:19 pm
— Medina v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 am
Their lawsuit, Salim v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
Because the Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
” Slesinger v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 10:51 pm
In its September 9, 2016 opinion, the District Court recounted at length the administrative history of this project. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 11:14 pm
By Andrew DelaneyPreston v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:20 am
Rather, Rice asked the court to rule on the following questions:Was the Hearing Officer was bias, thus denying him a fair hearing? [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 12:59 pm
” Torres v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 12:59 pm
” Torres v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:25 am
The Court also denied cert in Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
” In this instance, said the court, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that the individual was guilty of the subject disciplinary charges. [read post]
