Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL" Results 4481 - 4500 of 8,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
Some government secrecy in national security investigations may be merited of course, but even 20 years ago, Senator Daniel Moynihan documented the problems arising from the government’s rampant overclassification. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm by Donald Thompson
 In People v Schreier, 22 NY3d 494 [2014], the Court made clear that surreptitiousness is a separate and distinct element from whether the recording was done without the subject’s knowledge or consent, and is also separate and distinct from the requirement that the recording took place in a location where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy (both of which are also required by the statute). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– New York lawyer Daniel Clement at his blog, the New York Divorce Report *Can* You Monopolize a Coffee Cartridge Market? [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:40 am
La fuerza jurídica del relato en la fazaña castellana bajomedieval, pp. 41-50 Jennifer Darrell«Contaré un caso»: la justicia y el poder en Lazarillo de Tormes, pp. 51-68 Luis Galván MorenoLa justicia en algunos autos bíblicos de Calderón, pp. 69-80 Antonio Barnés VázquezDon Quijote y Preciosa ante lo justo, pp. : 81-90 María Pilar García NegroIusfeminismo de Rosalía de Castro como refundación de… [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On July 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Quebec (Commission des normes du travail) v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Prepare to wait – DOS passport and visa issuance database crash has worldwide impact – New Jersey lawyer Alka Bahal of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog, Immigration View Comic-Con v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:18 am
Daniels, 60 M.J. 69 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals 2004) (quoting Skinner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by John Bellinger
Although the panel held that the ATS did apply extraterritorially to cover plaintiffs’ claims, it nonetheless remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the suit presented a non-justiciable political question in light of the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]