Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 4481 - 4500 of 6,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 10:13 am by Eugene Volokh
” The district court’s reasoning chiefly rested on the general presumption against strict liability, to its reading of this statute, and to its reading of past precedents interpreting similar statutes; based on this, the court was willing to reject an out-of-circuit court of appeals precedent, United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:26 am by Ryan Scoville
The Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) creates federal jurisdiction over “any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:55 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The statute provides some of the broadest definitions of certain key terms in the entire United States Code. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:56 am by Florian Mueller
And it may just hope that judges or the decision-makers in competition authorities could be gaslighted when a topic is technical and uneasiness may just be enough to let Apple sustain a harmful monopoly in app distribution.Come May, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hear what Apple has been telling antitrust authorities around the globe for a while. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
     PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN AND THE TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITYThe United States District Court for the Central District of California went on to rule that Walt Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” had not lifted copyrighted elements from the screenplay of the same name. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
And Perry also supported Texas’s fatally flawed lawsuit against Pennsylvania, his own home state, and three other states. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am by Guest Blogger
Additionally, both the States and the private plaintiffs in the Supreme Court relied on the 1922 decision in Bailey v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.  A2190 Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA2228 Lafayette (MS) -- Provides for the… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
Instead, physical presence often reflected more the manner in which a company did business rather than the degree to which the company benefited from the provision of government services in the taxing state. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:13 pm by Robert Chesney
  If there is reason to believe that the receiving state is going to detain John Doe under the direction and control of the United States—that is, if there’s reason to believe the transfer is a sham to perpetuate U.S. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Newsday Inc. v Long Island Typographical Union No. 915, CWA, AFL-CIO, 915 F2d at 844-845, the Appellate Division noted that the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, held that an arbitral award was properly vacated under the public policy exception where an arbitrator reinstated a terminated employee who had engaged in multiple acts of sexual harassment. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Newsday Inc. v Long Island Typographical Union No. 915, CWA, AFL-CIO, 915 F2d at 844-845, the Appellate Division noted that the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, held that an arbitral award was properly vacated under the public policy exception where an arbitrator reinstated a terminated employee who had engaged in multiple acts of sexual harassment. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Amy Howe
  The first was Freeman v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:04 pm by Cyber Lawyer
Rather, the United States Supreme Court has held that “[t]he copyright is limited to those aspects of the work—termed 'expression'—that display the stamp of the author's originality. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:18 am by Jamal Greene
United States was correctly decided? [read post]