Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 4,614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 9 (1987) (legislative history).Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:16 am
" If the court grants the motion, it returns the property; if it does not grant the motion, you don't get your property back.Nothing in the law is simple, but basically the rule is that a court should not grant a Rule 41(g)-style motion for the return of seized property as long as there is a criminal case "pending" against the owner, a case with regard to which the property is relevant as evidence. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:40 am
Code § 35-41-5-2). [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
Allegations of Child Abuse at Abu Ghraib Prison (July 7, 2004)41. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Lawrence Rosenthal, Does Due Process Have an Original Meaning? [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
§ 101(41).Even where the relationship does not fit within the examples given in the Bankruptcy Code, a person may hold insider status. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
So, now that the Stros are done with that, where does the club go from here? [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
ARMY" Logo, Sustains 2(d) Refusal Precedential No. 28: "CLUB PALMS MVP" Confusingly Similar to "MVP" for Casino Services, TTAB Rules Precedential No. 27: Board Finds Family of "HOG" Marks, Sustains 2(d) Opposition to "DIRT HAWG" and "WATER HAWG" for Wet and Dry VacuumsSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: "EQUITY RESIDENCE CLUB" Merely Descriptive of Real Estate Development Services, Says TTAB Addition of "THE" to… [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Lawrence Rosenthal, Does Due Process Have an Original Meaning? [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 10:49 pm
Does Art.32 really require that there be a means of judicial review of this? [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Op. 1-2. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:24 am
(Under Section 41 of the Roads Act 1993, the Minister can issue directions to the Authority on any matter). [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 9:09 am
"The company does not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to executive officers, except that the company aircraft is made available for the personal use of Mr. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:46 am
On the contrary, the comparison must be made by examining each of the marks in question as a whole, which does not mean that the overall impression conveyed to the relevant public by a composite trade mark may not, in certain circumstances, be dominated by one or more of its components (see order in Matratzen Concord v OHIM, paragraph 32; Medion, paragraph 29).42 As the Advocate General pointed out ..., it is only if all the other components of the mark are negligible that the assessment of… [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
Id. at 6739-41. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Ghandour - These proper person appeals present us with an opportunity to clarify two issues: (1) that our decision in Rickard v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
Id. at *23 ("Without more, parallel conduct does not suggest conspiracy, and a conclusory allegation of agreement at some unidentified point does not supply facts adequate to show illegality. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
GPI presents two issues for our review: 1. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:53 am
Those remaining Trade-mark Regulation amendments will come into force on October 1, 2007. [read post]
