Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 11,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm
Following decisions in such cases as Connelly v RTZ, Lubbe v Cape and Ngcobo v Thor Chemicals, the present case contributes to the development of the law relating to the jurisdiction of English co [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
In eBay v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Soriano v Forensic News LLC [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) is interesting in a number of respects but in particular for its analysis of the circumstances in which the GDPR will apply to a publisher (or indeed any data controller/processor) based outside of the EU. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
The English court then referred two questions on the validity of the Roaming Regulation itself to the Court of Justice. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
Since the father does not speak English, his counsel requested an opportunity to confer with his client with the assistance of a Mandarin-speaking court interpreter. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 1:03 pm
Sept. 17, 2019): In Lehman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be argued that… [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:43 pm
Ferguson and Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be argued that… [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The judgment is available in almost every EU language bar English, so I report from a machine translation of the French version. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:52 pm
Bremerton School Dist. and West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
The three-part test for breach of confidence set out in the English case of "Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd" [1969] RPC 41 is well known to common-law practitioners. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:48 am
KGAA v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
The English Court of Chancery in Amicable Soc'y v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am
The court’s reasoning began with the well-known tripartite test for breach of confidence found in the English case of Coco v A N Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41, namely (as paraphrased by the court in LVM) that:(a) “the information must possess the quality of confidentiality;(b) the information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence; and (c) there must have been some unauthorised use of that information to the detriment of… [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
You are sitting in a café and discussing the US election with your French waiter (who speaks fluent English). [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:57 am
Alan also kindly shared with the IPKat readers an English translation of this German judgment. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:52 pm
Bremerton School Dist. and West Virginia v EPA. [read post]