Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2012, 3:22 am
Amidst a raft of judgments and opinions handed down by the CJEU on 6 September 2012, are several of note which relate to the EU private international law instruments, as follows: Brussels I Regulation Judgment: Case C-619/10, Trade Agency Ltd v Seramico Investments – application of Arts. 34(1) and (2) to the enforcement of an English default judgment, including an assessment as to whether the enforcement of a judgment given in default of appearance, without reasons, may… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:49 am
" Doe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:25 pm
The judgment was against Middle East Online Limited, a company responsible for the publication of an online news website publishing news items in English and Arabic, and its editor ([2020] EWHC 1992 (QB)). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
I covered the decision in Plain English for this blog; commentary comes from Sean Young at ACSblog. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In its February 20, 2013 decision in Cioffi-Petrakis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
Le Hara v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:11 am
Nay v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
The Panel in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm
The case of Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants Ltd (1981) 3 All ER 241 is a leading English precedent where copyright was refused for the word Exxon as an original literary work.Exxon argued it enjoyed copyright in the word Exxon having invested time and energy in employing linguists to invent the word, contending that the actual size of the literary work doesn't preclude a work from acquiring copyright protection. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm
Click here for Rosalind English’s detailed discussion of the bill. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 3:13 am
Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649 - A case that caused a frenzy of media activity and learned comment. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:33 am
FRAND is justiciable in an English court and enforceable in that court. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:54 pm
CommentAlthough this decision may appear harsh given that the elements of Claim 7 were disclosed in the US application, the AmeriKat questions whether it is correct to characterize this decision as\indicative of an increasingly strict treatment of priority in the English courts. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:23 am
Part of this portfolio is EP 1 841 268 B2, regarding the "access of a mobile station to a random access channel in dependence of its user class" ("EP268"), which, the French court explains, has been declared essential "by the English courts" (likely referring to the decision summarized here) to the UMTS/3G standard. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
In Opinion analysis: Justices reject publisher’s claims in gray-market copyright case, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 19, 2013, 12:22 PM), Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog nicely summarizes the ruling, in Plain English: In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Even since McCann v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
Mazer v Stein, 347 US 201, 214 (1954) concerns the protection of lamps. [read post]
