Search for: "Ex Parte May"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 12,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
Court of Military Commissions Review may continue to engage in the part-time practice of law and, if so, the circumstances under which they may do so. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
For the reasons set forth below, Defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part, as set forth below.BACKGROUNDBecause of the wide array of conduct alleged in Plaintiffs' Consolidated Complaint, (R. 79), and the varying circumstances alleged as to each named Plaintiff, the Court sets forth only a general background of the allegations sufficient to enable an understanding of the more specific allegations that are discussed in each section of the Court's… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Ex. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:57 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:57 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
May 21, 2014, MZWM again accelerated the Note, sending Crum a Notice of Acceleration of Loan Maturity via certified mail. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:48 am
In May 2017, the couple returned to a courtroom to appear before the same judge. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 10:17 am
But this information does suggest that voting forms part of an overall pattern of behavior that, collectively, may help to prevent former felons from reoffending. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
First, if the memorandum of lis pendens is approved ex parte, an aggrieved party may move to dissolve the memorandum and be heard within three days after providing notice to the plaintiff. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
First, if the memorandum of lis pendens is approved ex parte, an aggrieved party may move to dissolve the memorandum and be heard within three days after providing notice to the plaintiff. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
First, if the memorandum of lis pendens is approved ex parte, an aggrieved party may move to dissolve the memorandum and be heard within three days after providing notice to the plaintiff. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Recognizing the need for an expedited, low-cost alternative to patent litigations for reviewing certain aspects of patent validity, Congress introduced various patent challenging mechanisms at the USPTO over the years, from ex parte reexamination and the short-lived inter partes reexamination (IPRex) to the new inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings enacted with Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
In an op-ed emblematic of the times, Eileen Zimmerman recounts the fall of her ex-husband, Peter, into addiction and, ultimately death. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
” At The Litigation Daily (subscription required), Tony Mauro looks back at “one of the few cases in which the high court has ruled on the pardon power: the 1866 decision in Ex Parte Garland, involving one of the most prolific—and acerbic—advocates before the court: Augustus Garland. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
Finding neither, the court next proceeded to conduct an in camera, ex parte inquiry of the informant and examined the People's exhibits to determine whether the informant's life and/or future investigations would be jeopardized by disclosure. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 5:11 pm
I think at one point, they viewed the amnesty program as being a violation of the ex post facto clause which was an argument that I had a hard time to even understand, let alone argue against effectively just because it was so strange.Scott Henson: The whole process was very strange. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
An ex tempore judgment was given. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 2:39 pm
If one spouse is acting in good faith, and if the other spouse needlessly complicates the divorce process or the negotiations, a California court may order the uncooperative spouse to pay a considerable part of the other spouse’s attorney fees. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 2:53 pm
In EM ex rel NM v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
And it is perhaps the most important distinction of all, because it tells us—and Congress—that whatever may be the grounds for impeachment and removal, dislike of a president's policy is definitely not one of them, and ought to play no part in the decision on impeachment. [read post]
