Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 4,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:46 pm
There are apparently three individual entities or groups of movants left for the lead plaintiff role at the date of that document’s filing, 15 February 2007, the other two being Pensionskassernes Administration A/S of Denmark, Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP of the Netherlands, Sjunde AP-Fonden of Sweden and Mississippi PERS of the US, collectively (represented by Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler LLP and Grant & Eisenhofer PA) and Union Asset Management Holding AG of Germany… [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 1:57 am
Much like in the Ligue Contre Racisme v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
Ferrero SpA, which makes the delicious Nutella chocolate spread and iconic TicTacs, has rights to the word FERRERO in Germany that go back to 1977. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:44 pm
These were often the same kiddie porn attachments seen in the e-mail accounts of a different pedophile (Herbert Mumenthaler) in Germany who had 450 incoming e-mails with kiddie porn and 25 outgoing e-mails with kiddie porn; in other words, someone who we're pretty positive deliberately collects and disseminates the stuff.Is it possible that Kelley was just randomly spammed -- on both of his (sexually explicit) accounts -- with the same kiddie porn that was collected and distributed by… [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:38 am
These orders have resulted in pending proceedings for infringement against SanDisk in Germany and the Netherlands (non-border-related infringement proceedings are also outstanding in Germany and Italy). [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:59 pm
The Supreme Court heard argument in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 7:54 am
Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 9:55 am
Federal Republic of Germany). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:39 am
Germany. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 10:42 am
Allard Knook at ECJ Blog has picked up on Advocate General Ruiz-Colomer's opinion in the Commission v Germany case, C-112/05. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Among the many disputes that the ECJ and its little brother the Court of First Instance (CFI) have to consider are the following:Tuesday 13 FebruaryCase C-132/05 Commission v Germany, a hearing of an action against Germany for failing to provide adequate geographical indication protection against use of the word 'Parmesan' for products that do not conform to the specification of the protected designation of origin 'Parmigiano Reggiano'.Case T-256/04… [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 6:51 am
., Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. and Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:05 am
In 2006, the list was topped by applications from the United States of America (USA), Japan, Germany, Republic of Korea and France. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 10:37 pm
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Israel Bio-Engineering Project v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:22 pm
Voda v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:25 am
We have drawn in the line of the Milky Way to show this, but it is not, as far as we know, actually drawn on the ground.As we shall be presenting a paper on this topic in May of this year in Horn / Bad Meinberg, Germany, at the Machalett Conference on Preshistory and Early History, this posting just contains the basics of our discovery.It was 30 years ago in the year 1977 that this author first visited the petroglyphs (rock drawings) of Tanum, located in Tanumshede,… [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
Germany boasts its famed Bundespatentgerichtshof in Munich near the German and European Patent Offices; the Bundespatentgerichtshof has exclusive trial jurisdiction over patent validity challenges and similarly dispenses prompt justice.The manufacturing industries of the United States are largely blind to use of a global patent system to create patent beachheads and exclusive positions in foreign markets. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:16 am
Here this included Art.5(2).* It appeared from Davidoff II that Germany had implemented Art.5(2). [read post]
