Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:25 am
The leading Tennessee civil case on point is Zakour v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:40 pm
In Gabelli v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:11 pm
The post United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
In Walker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
In the non-precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Tabb v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore the scope of claim 1 is not clearly defined.It is true that some indications concerning the GPC measurement conditions are given on page 28 of the description, but said conditions are not part of claim 1. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:07 am
My claim, roughly, is that a Wednesbury unreasonable decision is one that a court is entitled, given the evidence before it, to conclude was wrong, given the evidence before the authority when it made the decision. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 5:06 pm
In a recent New Jersey Case, Bermeo v Bermeo, the court decided whether or not to increase alimony payments after a property settlement agreement. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:14 pm
Our Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:47 am
No. 2 v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:44 am
First, as explained by the court, Apple argued that if Heidari and Etemad are given access to Apple's confidential information (as would be required for them to act as experts), Apple would suffer extreme prejudice in the marketplace as both Heidari and Etemad are active in patenting mobile technology. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:15 pm
At which point the owners tore the thing down literally the next day.The Court of Appeal agrees with the trial court that given these events, the owners don't have to submit to an environmental review. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:41 pm
(As well as, potentially, many times of bars and restaurants.)Now, for many people, that might well be viewed as a win, given their particular taste in music.But whether it's a W or an L, after today, I strongly suspect it's going to happen.'Cause no one wants to be sued for sexual harassment. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:59 am
But given that the honest party loses in the Ninth Circuit, that's not likely to encourage its repetition, I imagine.Read the whole thing for a romping good time. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
By Jason Rantanen Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:14 am
MySpace, Ebeid v. [read post]
