Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 4481 - 4500 of 36,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2022, 10:26 am by The Murray Law Firm
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by Svetlana S. Gans and Natalie Hausknecht
 For example, the agency requests the public weigh in on the practices “companies use to surveil consumers,” intangible and unmeasurable “harms” created by such practices, the most harmful practices affecting children and teens, techniques that “manipulate consumers into prolonging online activity,” how the commission should balance costs and benefits from any regulation, biometric data practices, algorithmic errors and disparate impacts,… [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by privacylawyer
There is a case from Ontario called R. v. [read post]
., reserving the right to change privacy terms and then changing the terms in material and misleading ways) The sale of data to advertisers, data brokers, and other third parties, as well as the purchase of data from these entities and the pulling of data from public sources The lack of true choice or control consumers have over their data – because information is hidden or confusing, companies operate behind the scenes, “dark patterns” obscure their choices, and companies… [read post]