Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones" Results 4481 - 4500 of 6,019
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2011, 2:08 pm by Victoria Pynchon
Save your battles for when they actually matter and accept that you suck, too. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Since they can't win no matter what they do, they will almost certainly become less productive, and they may leave Michigan, which could use the tax revenue. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
" With large law firms paying millions of dollars each on advertising, PR, and communications, it's only a matter of time until we see law firms creating their own online media outlets. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:24 pm by David Lat
People have been steadily leaving, with [the loss of IP partners David Gay and Astrid Spain to Jones Day] as probably the final straw. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm by NL
DJ Armon-Jones heard the application. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm by NL
DJ Armon-Jones heard the application. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Ashby Jones: For almost 30 years, companies have used the pill as the critical legal tool to ward off hostile takeovers. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:43 pm by David Lat
But as Joseph Goldstein suggests, in a very interesting article just published by Slate and ProPublica, the issue of superannuated jurists is no laughing matter….Over at the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones pulls out some key statistics from Goldstein’s piece:* About 12 percent of the nation’s 1,200 sitting federal district and circuit judges are 80 years or older;* Eleven federal judges over the age of 90 are hearing cases—compared with four just 20 years ago;*… [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:50 am by Mark Herrmann
Depending on who’s suing us, or who we’re suing, I might have a “Smith” case or a “Jones” case, but I guarantee you that no one in our legal department is educated by hearing that we’re involved in the Aon case. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 4:40 pm
The reason the first of these matters is that it is possible for the company to resort to the doctrine of constructive notice to defeat a claim of apparent authority, subject to the doctrine of indoor management. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 3:25 pm by Michael McCann
"I'm sitting there hoping to enjoy the game courtside and I thought it was going to work out great and in a matter of 15 minutes, it changed. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am by Christa Culver
BrownDocket: 10-224Issue(s): (1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a “presumption against preemption” requires a “narrow interpretation” of the Federal Meat Inspection Act's express preemption provision, in conflict with this Court's decision in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:19 pm by Walter Olson
When naming a new law, please, no acronyms, no victim names, and no assumptions about what it will accomplish [WSJ Law Blog on Brian Christopher Jones's recommendations] More: Wood. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
Neutral principles of law must be applied to decide such matters . . . [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:01 am by Kevin O'Keefe
National sources, no matter their location, could crowd source the story so as to identify leading information. [read post]