Search for: "JOHN DOES (1-5)"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 5,702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
Who does edit #1? [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
When it comes to understanding the potential risks, costs, and advantages of the various investment “products” offered today, a prudent investor must begin by understanding the role of the person from whom they are purchasing the investment. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Right-to-carry laws and violent crime The most-cited study supporting New York's very restrictive law is John J. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
John Stojetz, 2010 Ohio App. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
More recently, the Court held in Voltage Pictures v John Doe and Jane Doe (the Teksavvy case) that the information could be disclosed but only under strict conditions about its use. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Federal law does not allow campaign money to be spent improving politicians’ personal lives. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Peglar (1996), 22 B.C.L.R. (3d) 251 (B.C.C.A.) and distilled section 6(4) and 6(5) into four components: 1. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
Principled pragmatism, of the sort suggested by John Ruggie in the construction of the UNGP, then require a balancing of law and norm, of enterprise and state, and of engagement and judgement (here ¶¶ 70-81). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:03 am
” The Virginia Geofence Warrant Around 5 p.m. on May 20, 2019, a man with a gun robbed a bank near Richmond, Virginia, escaping with $195,000. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:48 pm
I should also point out that Naz Foundation does not imply that any morality-based legislation or governmental action is no longer permitted. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
As federal district Judge John D. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
A decent and humane society does not deliberately kill human beings. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
Two individual plaintiffs, Neill Hurley and John Nantz, joined the lawsuit and alleged that even without the tax penalty they would continue to purchase health insurance because the Individual Mandate remained in place. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
For instance, there is no provision like Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the United States Constitution in any of the treaties establishing the TEU that protects intellectual property rights like the United States does.[39] While the ultimate goal is to harmonize all Member States in their approach to intellectual property rights, such a goal has not yet been entirely attained. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Interestingly, the choice to redeem one’s shares does not impact the ability to vote in favor of completing the de-SPAC. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2004] EWCA Civ 1462) it withstood a challenge mounted on the footing that sections 6 and 12 HRA taken together required a judge considering an application for an interim injunction in a defamation case to ask himself whether the claimant was ‘more likely than not’ to be able to establish at trial that publication should not be allowed (that is, to ask himself the question the HRA would require him to ask if it were a claim for breach of confidence… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am
There were 5 laboratory confirmed cases of E. coli O157:H7 and 1 probable case. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024).Paul Butler Like most users of illegal drugs, I have never been caught. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
