Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 8,224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 6:38 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Concepcion v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:31 am
Individual Inventor v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:35 pm
Kennedy would rather be remembered as being like Earl Warren, the author of Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:40 am
Kennedy, Brian M. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:23 am
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
United States (2012), to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
He compares the case to US v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:18 am
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy and Breyer seemed a little more on the fence. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
By: Gene Quinn (IPWatchdog.com) Last week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the matter of Bowman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:48 pm
That’s why, in cases like Munaf v. [read post]