Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 4481 - 4500 of 6,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2012, 2:30 am
This was many years before the United States Supreme Court would decide to outlaw school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm by National Indian Law Library
(tax records, sovereign immunity)United Keetoowah Band of Cheeroke Indians in Oklahoma v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:33 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:32 am by Nerds in Court
At 19, he was known as Kimble (referencing the main character of The Fugitive), a Munich-based hacker who had cracked United States corporate PBX codes (PBX is Private Branch eXchange, a term for a phone system serving a particular office). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:32 am by Nerds in Court
At 19, he was known as Kimble (referencing the main character of The Fugitive), a Munich-based hacker who had cracked United States corporate PBX codes (PBX is Private Branch eXchange, a term for a phone system serving a particular office). [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  (In the afternoon I make Pierson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm by Paul McGreal
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:31 pm by Dusty Elias Kirk
Pursuant to the lease, the tenant constructed a 415,000 sq. ft., 29-unit strip shopping center, a free-standing movie theater, a restaurant, and parking lots, upon the land. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:31 pm by Dusty Elias Kirk
Pursuant to the lease, the tenant constructed a 415,000 sq. ft., 29-unit strip shopping center, a free-standing movie theater, a restaurant, and parking lots, upon the land. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:29 am by Richard Bortnick
It also could impact similar lawsuits currently pending, such as Choice Escrow and Land Title, LLC v. [read post]