Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 13,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 2:40 pm
An interesting case about libel and science; I will quote from the magistrate's report and recommendations in Santilli v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:59 am
Our new tag line. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:39 am
” Brookfield Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:49 am
New People’s Bank, Inc., 1:17CV00044, 2018 WL 1659482, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am
” (This push gained little traction; but Chief Justice John Roberts, who helped draft the measure as a young administration staffer, would go on to pen the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Herring v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm
President Trump launched a new drone initiative last year, which will allow a larger range of tests than federal aviation regulators generally permit, including flying drones at night, over people, and beyond an operator’s line of sight. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Noteworthy: fewer people voted. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:45 am
New case: Lewis v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:04 am
Case citation: Gersh v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:53 am
In [an earlier precedent, State v.] [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am
Johnson (1870), People v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
One might relate, empirically, to how constrained people actually feel when they are criticized by administrators who run an institution. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:07 pm
Today's Qualcomm v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:57 am
The reason it is probable is U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 6:23 am
Notwithstanding this focus, I ask the committee to appreciate there are many other elements of the legislation from a criminal justice point of view that are of equal importance and concern including, but not limited to: Potential for disproportionate enforcement towards black, indigenous, and other racialized Canadians; The lack of clear and mandatory control measures to secure marijuana in dwellings, particularly in the homes of young people; which, in turn makes marijuana easily… [read post]
2 May 2018, 6:23 am
Notwithstanding this focus, I ask the committee to appreciate there are many other elements of the legislation from a criminal justice point of view that are of equal importance and concern including, but not limited to: Potential for disproportionate enforcement towards black, indigenous, and other racialized Canadians; The lack of clear and mandatory control measures to secure marijuana in dwellings, particularly in the homes of young people; which, in turn makes marijuana easily… [read post]
2 May 2018, 3:23 am
And at the Supreme Court, during last week’s oral arguments in the travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:01 pm
The result in Naruto v. [read post]
