Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 4481 - 4500 of 15,539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2018, 7:50 am by John Floyd
  Common Schedule IV drugs include:   Xanax Soma Darovan Darvocet Valium Ativan Ambien Tramadol   Schedule V   Schedule V drugs are defined as having a lower potential for abuse than Schedule IV drugs, and they consist mainly of drug preparations that contain low doses of narcotics. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Neil Makhija
Supreme Court decisions, and the recent decision in Husted v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Children from high-income families are 10x more likely to apply for a patent than children from low income families, even controlling for educational achievement. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Patrick’s preference was to keep a low profile socially and stay out of the public eye, preferring family activities, quiet time and work. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:24 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
But in my view as a Boston Massachusetts felony defense lawyer, the key to seeing through to the real source of this judicial liberalism, which caused Mickey Rivera to be released on bail in the first place last fall (2017), isn’t so much the judge who first released Rivera last fall (judge McGuire), as it was the Supreme Judicial Court’s instructions to Massachusetts judges on bail procedures, in its August 2017 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:17 pm by Bona Law PC
” It also can set up a market where consumers can choose among low-price and low-service brands, high-price and high-service brands, and everything in between. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
Infringement of any of the easyGroup trademarksArticle 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c) EU Trade Mark RegulationEasy CatIf the only similarity between the trade mark and the sign complained of is a common element that is descriptive or otherwise of low distinctiveness, that points against there being a likelihood of confusion (Whyte and Mackay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 1271 (Ch), [2015] FSR 33 at [43]-[44]).Consequently, there was no infringement of any of the easyGroup… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by Ben
"The formulation 'should have known' reflects negligence and is therefore too low a standard," the appellate judges wrote. [read post]