Search for: "Mark May"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 64,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
Indeed, one could think of other hand gestures enjoying greater distinctive character (inherent or acquired) which may, one day, find their way to the US Patent and Trademark Office's desk. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 3:23 am
The Board, however, rejected the noun/adjective distinction, pointing out that both nouns and adjectives may be generic. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:59 am
On May 3, 2024, the CAFC remanded to the Board its decision in iFit's opposition to registration the mark I-FIT FLEX for safety eyewear. iFit claimed likely confusion with its registered mark IFIT for exercise equipment and related services. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:22 am
" Both parties offer their services via the Internet: respondent’s services are targeted “for use by children and youth,” while petitioner’s services are more generally oriented and may include services for children and youth. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 3:36 am
The Board sustained this opposition to registration of the mark ALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY WALK TO FIGHT ALZHEIMER'S & Design on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the common law mark WALK TO END ALZHEIMER'S & Design, both marks for charitable fundraising services. [read post]
17 May 2022, 5:08 am
In re Skydio, Inc., Serial No. 88928113 (May 10, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:43 am
Waiwera LLC applied to register the mark GINGERELLA for "vodka, gin, rum," but the USPTO refused registration under Section 2(d) in view of the identical mark for "Non-alcoholic ginger based carbonated soft drinks. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:36 am
It provides as an example of objective evidence that may cast doubt on an applicant's bona fides, the filing of "an excessive number of intent-to-use applications in relation to the number of products the applicant is likely to introduce." [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:51 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 4:13 am
Some say that one may predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) likelihood-of-confusion appeal just by looking at the marks and the goods or services involved. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:11 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.October 14, 2020 - 11 AM: In re Simoniz USA, Inc., Serial No. 87865135 [Section 2(d) refusal of SIMONIZ CERAMICSHIELD for "Paint sealant for exterior surfaces of vehicle" in view of the registered mark PLATINUM CERAMIC SHIELD for "“Clear coating protectant containingceramic nanoparticles for use on vehicles" [CERAMIC disclaimed].October 20, 2020 - 11 AM: In re Carolyn… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 3:15 am
Valencia may, in some cases, refer to Valencia, Spain, but not all "Valencia"-type rice originates there. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
Moreover, based on Applicant's website, the Board "may draw an inference that applicant intends to create a connection with Paul Mauriat. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:06 am
""The fact that EAST COAST may identify more than one geographic location does not necessary detract from the term's primary geographic significance. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:18 pm
May Kulthol, states that Starbucks has long owned the rights to its name and logo in India. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Kotler and Mark E. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:06 am
When he was on such a committee, the system was set up to catch those missed points while the marking schedule was still in draft and to re-mark every paper with such answers in mind (it may still work this way). [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 5:12 pm
The same customers, i.e., the general public, may encounter both parties' goods and services. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 12:07 am
Moreover, doesn't the Board often say that, when two marks are virtually identical, even sophisticated consumers may be confused? [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
This may happen in some parts of the real world, but not in court. [read post]
