Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:27 am
United States Postal Serv., 456 F.3d 1270, 1274 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
Kazakhstan also commenced an action against the unnamed Does in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking injunctive relief and damages.On March 4, 2015, Kazakhstan initiated this limited action in King County Superior Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
United States (Endangered Species Act; Water Rights)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:28 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 8, 55 Cal.4th 1083 (2012); UFCW, Local 324 v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:35 am
Virginia, decided in 1967 during the high water mark of the Warren Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:55 am
This makes sense in the United States, where the discovery process is quite liberal. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
" (page 11) Of course, the states will appeal this to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:35 am
Many of us in the United States are hitting the road/airport this weekend to get in the last bit of Summer. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
The Market Development Agreement explicitly stated that the parties must execute a separate franchise agreement for each unit. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 2:14 pm
In the first, United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Predicate Racketeering Activities Deemed 'Related'; 'Pattern of Racketeering Activity' Established United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKElection Law 'Motor Voter' Law Breached by Failure to Name SUNY, CUNY Offices as Registration Agencies United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:27 am
United States U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
That resulting consumer confusion in the United States, however, falls squarely within the scope of the interests that the Lanham Act seeks to protect. [read post]
