Search for: "Matthews v. Matthews"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 5,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
" to Microsoft v i4i Something else that seems to keep nearing an end only to grasp at one last gasp of air is the i4i v Microsoft litigation (see previous AmeriKat posts here – and there are many). [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors heard 3 December 2010 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
Lockton v Persons Unknown [2009] EWHC 3423 (QB). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm
In DPP v Collins [2006] 1 WLR 2223 Lord Bingham said: Section 127(1)(a) does of course interfere with a person’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:18 am
Matthew Farrell [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:02 am
(Internet Cases) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Crippen, Matthew – Judge in Xbox modding trial berates prosecution, halts trial (ArsTechnica) (WIRED) Harper, Whitney – Supreme Court refuses innocent infringement P2P case (ArsTechnica) Mick Haig Productions – EFF asks Judges to protect identities in porn-downloading lawsuits – Mick Haig Productions v Does 1-670 and Third World Media v Does 1-1243 (Electronic Frontier Foundation)… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:00 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:42 am
+&hl=en&as_sdt=80000000000002 As Matthews v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 8:39 am
New Jersey Rule of Evidence 406 provides that (a) Evidence, whether corroborated or not, of habit or routine practice is admissible to prove that on a specific occasion a person or organization acted in conformity with the habit or routine... [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
Day, Matthew L.M. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm
Grant Hayden & Matthew T. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:44 pm
Matthews, 68 M.J. 29 (C.A.A.F 2009). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:06 am
Sitz III of Meinecke & Sitz, Cody, WyomingRepresenting Appellee (Plaintiff): Matthew D. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 7:06 am
Wall Street 2 is a sequel both because its title includes “2” and it continues the NYC plotline of the original (though the writing has worsened).The quibbling over spinoff v. sequel reminds me of one of those textbook trust and estate cases where the lawyer thoughtlessly inserts the words “now living” and inadvertently cuts a future-born child out of the will. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
State, Baldwin v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Glicksman, Matthew R. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:20 am
Alternative feminist judgment: R v A (No 2) [2001] UKHL 25 – guardian.co.uk: This ‘alternative’ judgment is part of the new Feminist Judgments Project, an interesting attempt by academics, practitioners and activists to produce 23 alternative feminist judgments to a series of key cases in English law. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:28 am
Sentencing Modification Aramis Matthew Simmons appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered upon his guilty plea, for one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child. [read post]
