Search for: "People v David S."
Results 4481 - 4500
of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
This case, Hannay v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
Very difficult claim to make because the information is public, or shared with a large number of people. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
Consider this paragraph from a review in today's Times of David Livingstone Smith's new book, Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others.Dehumanization — representing people to be lesser, nonhuman creatures, as when police officers label crimes against criminals as “N.H.I. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in Windsor v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Many people who choose to marry plan to enter the civil and religious state of marriage simultaneously—and would seriously object to a requirement that the two statuses be created separately. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Dousing the flames: the Tang Fuzhen self-immolation incident and urban land takings reform in the People’s Republic of China. 20 S. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 7:03 am
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2013.Fidler, David P. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
I would like to demonstrate the constitutive nature of narrative both as the collective story, memory and history of peoples, and as the individual or 'personal novel' each one of us tells himself in order to create his own identity. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
I think there’s something sick about making entertainment out of other people’s legal problems. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 8:06 pm
We want to provide people with greater control to protect themselves from these reputational risks. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 5:00 pm
” This important comment in the SCC’s 2015 CBC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am
” Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:59 pm
Full article can be found here Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn to be appealed The court case of Northwood Solihull ltd v Fearn has now been given leave to appeal. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:59 pm
Full article can be found here Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn to be appealed The court case of Northwood Solihull ltd v Fearn has now been given leave to appeal. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:57 pm
" (That's People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:43 am
Which brings me back to the Betz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, McCoy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:20 pm
The distinction of lawyer v. non-lawyer is very artificial. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
