Search for: "People v. Block"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 4,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Merely speeding down the street, even in tandem with another vehicle, does not constitute a "speed contest" within the meaning of that statute (see People v Grund, 14 NY2d 32; see also Shea v Kelly, 121 AD2d 620, 621). [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 4:40 pm
BAPCPA, for good or bad, was trying to block people from moving across state lines to indulge in high homestead exemptions on the eve of bankruptcy (i.e., "mansion arbitrage"). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
On the first complaint, the facts of the case line up very closely with the Universal v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
It appears that nothing will change that conduct and that the Department bears grudges against people who engage lawyers, particularly competent ones.We ask that you please immediately summons the people in your case management area and ask them why it is that they have refused to correspond with me in accordance with Mr Boutsis' directions and requests, refused to provide reports to me, refused to progress his retirement and otherwise behaved in a shamefully non-communicative… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 11:15 am
In Antonelli v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:10 am
The civil law relating to clamping was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest.[2000] EWCA Civ 106.In the Vine case, the earlier case of Arthur v Anker and another [1997] QB 564 is discussed.The Vine caseThe appellant in this case was Helen Vine. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:38 am
The first case is State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
While whatever crime was going on in the street, the defendant claimed that he was upstairs, down the block, gambling in a whorehouse. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:47 am
Veoh; Tiffany v. eBay; Cisneros v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:12 pm
Because of numerous Supreme Court decisions, including the 6-3 decision in 2005, in Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Chamberlain Professor of Legislation, Columbia Law School Jeremy Creelan, Partner, Jenner & Block, LLP, former Deputy Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
The case is called State of Connecticut v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Part V will be the conclusion. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:02 am
The Mississippi case is Seale v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
One Arizona prison official, Frank Terry, testified that Schad was placed in a relatively lowsecurity prison block because he posed no disciplinary problems or security risks, and another official, Jerry McKeand, elaborated that Schad actually assisted with other prisoners' disciplinary issues by helping to "keep[ ] the cell block kindof in line. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:31 am
With references to VHS tapes and the decision to block network-based PVR services, Bill C-61 was outdated the moment it was introduced. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
See City of New York v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:55 am
Authors’ Guild v. [read post]
