Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
(See, e.g., People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
During the deliberations, at least one Senator objected to making any cross-references from the new text to the old, arguing that the proposed amendment "would render it necessary in order to avoid confusion to repeal the section which comes within its purview. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
A portion of the decision lamented the dearth of specifics offered by the People's Republic of China's State Secret Law with respect to determining whether information produced is protected and what liability would attach to that disclosure. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:08 am
Beastie Boys v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:34 pm
The revelation on Thursday contrasts oddly with the announcement Google made on the same day concerning a patent pledge.The new German filing is not an infringement action over new patents but represents a major escalation of four previous Motorola v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:09 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:57 am
I like cake.State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
The case was Simpson v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am
Von Braun’s crown jewel was his developing the Saturn V rocket that carried men to the moon. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 7:50 am
Williams State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
FTC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am
FanFirm commenced proceedings against Fanatics for:Trade mark infringement;Rectification of the Register through cancellation of Fanatics’ trade mark registrations;Misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of the Australian Consumer Law; andPassing off,while Fanatics cross-claimed with the same allegations against FanFirm.Justice Helen Rofe oversaw the proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia, issuing her decision on 17 July 2024. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
I keep my fingers crossed, but there are so many other things going on that I'm sure it's not a question of if, but when, the app store situation will improve. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm
But in 2021, in TransUnion v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
"] From Tuesday's decision in Calhoun v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
Wickard v. [read post]
