Search for: "People v. David" Results 4481 - 4500 of 6,015
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
His ethics case, Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by James Bickford
Connecticut; he concludes that “Mass. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
I could go on -  but reading too much of this kind of thing leads me to feel, like David Cameron (but for slightly different reasons), “a little uneasy”. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm by Lisa McElroy
  In Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Charon QC
Prime Minister David Cameron’s statement on Thursday last on privacy law – described by David Allen Green in our Without Prejudice podcast as ‘legally illiterate’ (rightly) – continues to arouse ridicule, hyperventilation by those who support him,  and sane critical legal analysis by people who do actually know what they are talking about. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:18 am by Bill Raftery
The threats to impeach 4 Iowa Supreme Court justices for their same-sex marriage decision (Varnum v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm by Glenn Reynolds
I don’t know how many of these people might be alive today if just one of the several hundred people locked in Norris Hall had a weapon, but I do know that all of these people had a right to life and a right to defend it. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
  At 9.30am, in the case of The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis & anr v Times Newspapers and at 10.00am in the case of Aspion v Daniel. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
This attack comes at a time when the world needs every agricultural tool available to meet the needs of a growing population, expected to reach 9 billion people by 2050. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:53 am by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) Rehabilitating Lochner, Conclusion:The longstanding myth of a wildly activist, reactionary Supreme Court imposing a grossly unpopular laissez-faire ideology on the American people on behalf of large corporate interests—with little concern for precedent, constitutional text, or individual or minority rights—is far removed from historical reality. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:35 am by David Post
(David Post) As I’ve noted before on a number of occasions, a possible landmark copyright case is now before the 2d Circuit, Viacom et al. v. [read post]