Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 16,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
The authors conducted several computations on this specific component of the data, and concluded, …it seems likely that the racial disparity reflects something not merely about the students, but about legal education itself—which may be unsurprising, given the substantial literature on how people of color, and those with less privileged socioeconomic backgrounds, can find law school alienating or a challenging adjustment, to the detriment of their performance. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:30 am
We know how they wear people down, particularly vulnerable people, and get them to admit to things just to get out of the windowless room. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Though the Court punted in Frank v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
In Bunch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
Most people fixate on the first element of legal malpractice – departure from good practice. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
The majority rebuts every facet of the argument, emphasizing–as it obvious to everyone but Section 230-haters–that deciding what to publish is an editorial function, whether it’s done by people or machines. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:34 am
v=G54xqdI--Fc As usual for our episodes, the full script is also posted right below the video on YouTube. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
Given that 658 people did not reach a settlement but were apparently left untroubled, Virgin Media argued that this was evidence that the Applicants in the present case were simply interested in setting up a money-making scheme, not suing anyone or seeking genuine redress. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Robart, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit), and Huawei v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:24 pm
” People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
” And moving beyond the courts, oaths might even be beyond the capacity of other members of the legislature to judge: in Bond v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
On 26 July 2019 the UK Supreme Court granted the defendant in the case of Serafin v Malkiewicz permission to appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal allowing the claimant’s appeal against the dismissal of the claim by Jay J (see our post here). [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:32 pm
Additional Resources: Wilson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
” The justices also granted certiorari in Espinoza v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Putting these people in the criminal justice system would free up detention space for the DHS to keep people detained during their removal proceedings. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
In Booker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
No extension of time shall be granted without the approval of at least two of the three judges. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
No extension of time shall be granted without the approval of at least two of the three judges. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
In Part V of the census opinion, the chief justice found a way to provide a unique check here. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:11 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
